Loading WNBA evidence…

Loading page…

Luisa Geiselsoder · WNBA 2026 — Beyond the Box

Luisa Geiselsoder

ESPN WNBA current-season summaryREG · 2026 · Coverage: partial · Freshness: stale · Publication: partialSource as of: Oct 27, 2026 · Data through: Oct 27, 2026

2026 per game

PTS: 4.5
REB: 2.6
AST: 1.3
STL: 0.3
BLK: 0.4

21 GP · 16.6 MIN

The read

Fingerprint is unavailable for this player-season.

PerformanceOpen tab →

Last 10 games vs season average

Chart data by game date
Game date	Value
2026-06-05	5
2026-06-07	4
2026-06-11	6
2026-06-13	7
2026-06-15	9
2026-06-24	2
2026-07-09	3
2026-07-16	1
2026-07-18	0
2026-07-28	0
Reference	4.48

L10 PTS: 3.7
vs season: −0.8
L10 +/-: —

HistoryOpen tab →

Points per game by season

Game by game · 2026

Each point is one published game. The line is the trailing mean of the last five known games; unknown values leave gaps and remain explicit in the data table.

View trend data table

PTS trend data by game date
Game	Game date	Raw metric	5-game rolling mean
1	May 9, 2026	8.0	8.0
2	May 12, 2026	13.0	10.5
3	May 14, 2026	6.0	9.0
4	May 18, 2026	2.0	7.3
5	May 20, 2026	4.0	6.6
6	May 23, 2026	6.0	6.2
7	May 25, 2026	6.0	4.8
8	May 27, 2026	3.0	4.2
9	May 29, 2026	6.0	5.0
10	May 30, 2026	0.0	4.2
11	Jun 2, 2026	3.0	3.6
12	Jun 5, 2026	5.0	3.4
13	Jun 7, 2026	4.0	3.6
14	Jun 11, 2026	6.0	3.6
15	Jun 13, 2026	7.0	5.0
16	Jun 15, 2026	9.0	6.2
17	Jun 17, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
18	Jun 24, 2026	2.0	5.6
19	Jun 26, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
20	Jun 28, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
21	Jul 4, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
22	Jul 9, 2026	3.0	5.4
23	Jul 11, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
24	Jul 14, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
25	Jul 16, 2026	1.0	4.4
26	Jul 18, 2026	0.0	3.0
27	Jul 22, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
28	Jul 28, 2026	0.0	1.2
29	Jul 31, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
30	Aug 2, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
31	Aug 6, 2026	Unknown	Unknown
32	Aug 16, 2026	Unknown	Unknown

Splits · points per game

Home (11): 5.4
Away (10): 3.5
Starter (9): 6.0
Bench (12): 3.3
Wins (8): 4.8
Losses (13): 4.3

Game log

Regular-season game lines, newest first, up to 60 games. Participation status is published evidence; completion status is also shown, and unknown does not imply played, did not play, or completed. An em dash means the value is unavailable.
Date	Opp	Result	Participation	Completion	MIN	PTS	FG	3P	FT	REB	OREB	DREB	AST	TOV	STL	BLK	PF	+/-
Aug 16, 2026	@ Phoenix Mercury	W 88–85	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Aug 6, 2026	vs Toronto Tempo	W 97–83	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Aug 2, 2026	vs Los Angeles Sparks	L 101–106	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jul 31, 2026	vs Indiana Fever	L 98–112	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jul 28, 2026	@ Las Vegas Aces	L 83–98	Played	Final	3	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	2	0	1	0	0	—	—
Jul 22, 2026	vs Dallas Wings	L 97–101	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jul 18, 2026	@ Minnesota Lynx	L 93–101	Played	Final	11	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	1	1	0	0	—	—
Jul 16, 2026	@ Washington Mystics	W 75–56	Played	Final	15	1	0-3	0-3	1-2	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	—	—
Jul 14, 2026	@ Connecticut Sun	L 87–90	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jul 11, 2026	@ Atlanta Dream	W 102–92	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jul 9, 2026	vs Las Vegas Aces	L 80–88	Played	Final	6	3	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	—	—
Jul 4, 2026	@ Seattle Storm	W 77–72	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jun 28, 2026	@ Washington Mystics	L 123–124	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jun 26, 2026	@ Chicago Sky	L 94–124	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jun 24, 2026	@ Chicago Sky	L 78–101	Played	Final	14	2	1-4	0-1	0-0	3	2	1	2	0	0	2	—	—
Jun 17, 2026	vs Seattle Storm	W 94–89	Did not play	Final	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jun 15, 2026	@ Minnesota Lynx	L 74–107	Played	Final	15	9	3-5	3-4	0-0	4	1	3	0	0	1	0	—	—
Jun 13, 2026	vs Dallas Wings	W 84–83	Played	Final	14	7	2-5	2-3	1-2	2	1	1	3	1	0	1	—	—
Jun 11, 2026	vs Las Vegas Aces	L 89–105	Played	Final	12	6	3-4	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	—	—
Jun 7, 2026	@ Los Angeles Sparks	L 72–89	Played	Final	15	4	2-4	0-2	0-0	4	1	3	0	1	0	1	—	—
Jun 5, 2026	vs Phoenix Mercury	L 72–78	Played	Final	18	5	1-4	1-4	2-2	3	0	3	3	3	0	0	—	—
Jun 2, 2026	@ Golden State Valkyries	L 77–95	Played	Final	11	3	1-4	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	—	—
May 30, 2026	vs Indiana Fever	W 100–84	Played	Final	12	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	1	0	0	—	—
May 29, 2026	vs Atlanta Dream	L 66–86	Played	Final	22	6	2-7	1-5	1-2	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	—	—
May 27, 2026	vs Connecticut Sun	W 71–61	Played	Final	19	3	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	2	1	2	0	—	—
May 25, 2026	@ New York Liberty	W 81–74	Played	Final	22	6	2-9	2-4	0-0	5	0	5	2	0	2	0	—	—
May 23, 2026	@ Toronto Tempo	W 99–80	Played	Final	20	6	3-7	0-2	0-0	5	1	4	0	1	0	1	—	—
May 20, 2026	@ Indiana Fever	L 73–90	Played	Final	22	4	1-3	0-1	2-2	1	0	1	1	2	0	0	—	—
May 18, 2026	vs Connecticut Sun	W 83–82	Played	Final	25	2	1-5	0-2	0-0	2	0	2	4	2	0	0	—	—
May 14, 2026	vs New York Liberty	L 82–100	Played	Final	22	6	3-6	0-2	0-0	5	0	5	1	1	1	0	—	—
May 12, 2026	vs New York Liberty	W 98–96	Played	Final	25	13	4-10	3-6	2-2	5	1	4	2	1	1	1	—	—
May 9, 2026	vs Chicago Sky	L 83–98	Played	Final	25	8	2-10	1-6	3-3	7	1	6	3	0	0	2	—	—

Shot zones · 2026

Most attempts: At the rim (0–4 ft)16% of attempts

33/100 field goals by zone · Source: ESPN via SportsDataverse (espn_wnba.shots), regular season.

View full data table

Shot zone data table, 2026
Zone	Made–att.	FG%	League %	vs league	Share
At the rim (0–4 ft)	9–16	56.3%	64.1%	−7.8 pts	16.0%
Short, left (4–10 ft)	1–3

DAWG — Recorded Actions · Regular season 2026

No recorded appearance in the regular season for this player, so there is no profile.

DAWG — Recorded Actions · Postseason 2026

Unavailable. No accepted WNBA Stats postseason box or play-by-play partition exists for 2026 in the local archive.

How this is calculated, and what it leaves out

DAWG — Recorded Actions covers four selected recorded box-score actions: steals, blocks, offensive rebounds and assists. It omits unrecorded off-ball work such as screens, box-outs, rotations, deflections and closeouts. It is not the full four-pillar DAWG model, and it does not measure motivation, toughness, complete defensive effectiveness or total player value.

Each component is counted per 40 played minutes, including overtime. The observed rate is count ÷ (minutes ÷ 40). The adjusted rate blends that record with the league population, using a Gamma–Poisson model fitted on nearby seasons (2022–2025) and never on the season being scored. Fewer minutes means more pull toward the league average; with many minutes the adjusted and observed rates nearly agree. For high-minute passers the pull is slightly too strong: on the 2026 holdout their adjusted assist rates predicted about 5% worse than their observed rates.

Each player is judged against her own position. Guards, forwards and centres come from her team's roster listing that season (the first letter of a hybrid such as G-F), not from the stats being ranked, so a guard's blocks are compared with other guards' and a centre's assists with other centres'. The DAWG index averages these position-relative percentiles; the league index beside it uses the whole league.

The league-wide reference is frozen and era-local: REG player-seasons in 2026 with at least 220 minutes and all four components observed (160 player-seasons, reference 4dbe09916e4b). League rates have changed a lot since 1997 (assists per 40 are roughly 25–35% higher today), so a player is compared with her own era, and the index is not an absolute comparison across eras. The index is the plain average of the four component percentiles, with equal weights chosen as a first-version policy rather than learned basketball values. It is an average of percentiles, not the percentile of the index itself, a probability or points added. If any component is missing, the index is not shown, and the remaining components are never re-weighted.

Turnovers, personal fouls and defensive rebounds are shown separately and are not subtracted. Their meaning depends on role and game context, so the index is a positive-activity profile, not net value.

Covers four selected recorded box-score actions only; unrecorded off-ball work (screens, box-outs, rotations, deflections, closeouts) is omitted.
Percentiles compare each player with her own position group (guards, forwards or centres, from her team's roster listing) in the same era; they are not absolute comparisons across eras or positions. The league-wide index is shown alongside.
Position groups are coarse listings: a hybrid such as G-F counts by its first letter. Players with no listing are compared with the whole league.
An average of component percentiles, not a percentile of the composite, a probability, points added or total player value.
Equal component weights are a fixed policy, not learned basketball values.
Adjusted rates are pulled toward the league-wide average, not the position average, so low-minute guards' blocks and offensive rebounds (and centres' assists) read slightly high within their group.
Turnovers and fouls are shown separately and are not subtracted; the index is a positive-activity profile, not net value.
Does not measure motivation, toughness or complete defensive effectiveness.
Component intervals are conditional empirical-Bayes estimates with fitted hyperparameters; they ignore hyperparameter uncertainty.
Conditional empirical-Bayes interval given fitted hyperparameters; hyperparameter uncertainty is not included.
10th-90th percentile of the index over 300 whole-game resamples with the reference fixed. A stability range, not a credible interval or ranking probability.
Percentiles of players with few minutes sit closer to 50 because their adjusted rates are pulled harder; early-season numbers understate standouts.

Edition: wnba_dawg_recorded_actions_v1 v1.2.0
Box source: wnba_stats.player_boxscores · partition updated 2026-09-28
Play-by-play: No accepted wnba_stats.play_by_play partition for 2026; PBP diagnostics are not shown for this season. (no last_good wnba_stats.play_by_play partition for season 2026)
Shrinkage gate: Passed: on the registered 2026 holdout, adjusted rates predicted later counts better than observed rates in all four components.
Status: Method 1.2.0. A descriptive profile of recorded actions; see the limitations above.

See the full DAWG — Recorded Actions table

BIRD scoring impact

Edition: WNBA 2026 season incl. playoffs
State: Season summary
Evidence through: 2026-09-29
Units: pts / 100 possessions vs. the WNBA reference

Prior-dominated. Admitted possessions cut the prior variance of total BIRD by only 44% (threshold 50%), so the prior still sets most of this estimate.

BIRD-OFF

Offensive scoring impact

−0.85

BIRD-OFF posterior intervals
50%	[−2.28, +0.58]
80%	[−3.57, +1.87]
95%	[−5.01, +3.31]

BIRD-DEF

Positive values mean fewer opponent points

−0.27

BIRD-DEF posterior intervals
50%	[−1.35, +0.81]
80%	[−2.32, +1.79]
95%	[−3.41, +2.87]

BIRD

OFF + DEF from the joint posterior

−1.12

BIRD posterior intervals
50%	[−3.05, +0.81]
80%	[−4.79, +2.55]
95%	[−6.74, +4.50]

Joint interval viewOFF, DEF, and Total

95% interval
80% band
50% interval

Draft

Undrafted, or no draft record is published.

Career by season

Published regular-season lines by season, newest first; one row per team. An em dash means the value is unavailable.
Season	Team	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	GS	FG%	3P%	FT%	TS%	USG%	AST%
2026	Portland Fire	21	16.6	4.5	2.6	1.3	0.3	0.4	—	33.0%	29.1%	80.0%	44.1%	—	—

Chart data by season
Season	Value
2026	4.48

Short, middle (4–10 ft)	4–14	28.6%	41.1%	−12.6 pts	14.0%

Short, right (4–10 ft)	2–6	33.3%	42.4%	—	6.0%

Mid-range, left baseline (10–16 ft)	0–0	—	40.9%	—	0.0%

Mid-range, left wing (10–16 ft)	0–0	—	39.2%	—	0.0%

Mid-range, middle (10–16 ft)	0–2	0.0%	41.4%	—	2.0%

Mid-range, right wing (10–16 ft)	0–1	0.0%	39.6%	—	1.0%

Mid-range, right baseline (10–16 ft)	0–0	—	36.8%	—	0.0%

Long two, left baseline	0–1	0.0%	36.6%	—	1.0%

Long two, left wing	0–0	—	38.2%	—	0.0%

Long two, middle	0–0	—	38.1%	—	0.0%

Long two, right wing	1–1	100.0%	38.5%	—	1.0%

Long two, right baseline	0–1	0.0%	32.7%	—	1.0%

Left corner three	3–6	50.0%	35.1%	—	6.0%

Right corner three	2–8	25.0%	35.7%	—	8.0%

Above-break three, left	4–11	36.4%	33.9%	+2.4 pts	11.0%

Above-break three, top	1–12	8.3%	35.0%	−26.7 pts	12.0%

Above-break three, right	5–13	38.5%	35.2%	+3.3 pts	13.0%

Deep three	1–5	20.0%	30.1%	—	5.0%

Shooting splits

Shooting splits for the selected season. An em dash means the value is unavailable.
Split	Made–att.	Value	Pctl
Field goals	33–100	33.0%	—
Threes	16–55	29.1%	—
Free throws	12–15	80.0%	—
True shooting	—	44.1%	—
Effective FG	—	41.0%	—
3PA rate	—	0.55	—
FT rate	—	0.15	—

BIRD posterior summary for Luisa Geiselsoder
Component	Summary
OFF	mean −0.85; 50% interval [−2.28, +0.58]; 80% interval [−3.57, +1.87]; 95% interval [−5.01, +3.31]
DEF	mean −0.27; 50% interval [−1.35, +0.81]; 80% interval [−2.32, +1.79]; 95% interval [−3.41, +2.87]
Total	mean −1.12; 50% interval [−3.05, +0.81]; 80% interval [−4.79, +2.55]; 95% interval [−6.74, +4.50]